My migraine is killing me, any cosmologist or scientist, someone take over my thoughts for me Please?

There is the process of evolution and the theory that our origin of "life" was the result of nature's electricity interacting with a concoction of non living elements to create a Living organism. Ever since the beginning, it was and is the undying process of living organisms by reproduction, we humans as well as all the other species of animals currently alive are the surviving byproducts of 3.5 billion+ years of evolution. One particular animal, the Human, evolved to a highly intelligent, highly cognitive organism, ultimately smart enough to Question with "words" (a human creation) of how we came to be here and what truly is this universe we live in. A better way to understand this is.....Here. Let's say there was no "electricity" or not the right mixture of elements on earth to to start life approx. 3-4 billion years ago, the important aspect of this is, essentially the grand Cosmos would continue to expand, spin in the laws of gravity, the supernovas would carry on, the Sun will eventually die off in the next few billion years, Whether or not "living" organisms came to be on earth. So you see, our understand of "life" is deterred in the sense that we humans feel as if the cosmos "Cares" about humans, when in fact we are merely an insignificant bunch living in the Grand Scheme of the Cosmos. So even to scientists....Will finding the answer to One fundamental law of nature, a singular explanation to the purpose of "Life" make any difference in the fact that whether we were dead or alive, the Cosmos would not give a rat's *** about us? Then again, are these all just words? Or is there "something" beyond the natural elements of our universe? Could cause and effect be relevant when speaking in terms of before the "non-living" organisms.